Transparent, rigorous, and fair
Every journal article and book manuscript undergoes a structured double-blind peer review. Here is exactly what happens at each stage.
Initial Screening
The editor-in-chief checks scope, originality, and formatting within 5 business days.
Reviewer Assignment
At least two independent experts in the field are selected from our global reviewer pool.
Double-Blind Review
Neither authors nor reviewers know each other's identity, ensuring unbiased assessment.
Author Revisions
Authors receive structured feedback and submit revisions within the agreed timeline.
Re-Review
Revised manuscripts are re-evaluated to confirm all concerns are fully addressed.
Final Decision
The editor issues accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject with full justification.
Building trust with every manuscript
Our average time from submission to first decision is 21 days. We publish reviewer reports alongside accepted articles for open-access journals, giving readers full transparency into the scholarly dialogue that shaped the final work.
Reviewers are recognized through our Reviewer Credit program, with public acknowledgment and ORCID-linked verification of their contributions. Authors can suggest or exclude reviewers, though final assignment rests with the editorial board.
Appeals are welcomed. If an author believes a decision was reached in error, a formal appeal may be submitted within 30 days, triggering review by a senior editor not involved in the original decision.
